In reponse to Karl on the Kucinich Bill.
I feel honored to have my name in the headline of Karl's blog, must have done something right - or wrong in this case. Karl did not like me calling him out on his defense of Kucinich Bill and decided to skewer me a bit. All in good fun, I had no intention to make this personal what so ever even if Karl believes that I have an "absolute vacuum" between my ears. Meh, helps with the neck pain at least. Karl does not actually state his defense for the bill or any of the points I brought up as to why the bill is just a blatant Marxist lurch, but instead focused on the Constitutional aspect of the debate. Fine, if Karl believes that Congress can be trusted to maintain the supply of money, believes that paying off the existing national debt in newly printed United States Notes is somehow possible without a major debasement and thinks Congress should control money for the purpose of infrastructure investment - so be it. To the Constitution we go. Karl demon...