Question 1 Massachusetts, Yes or No?
This is probably one of the most important questions in Massachusetts (MA) and something I have been thinking about for a long time. If we do not make the right decision here, it can only return in six years.
We are now bombarded by anti-question1 ads and I noticed that everywhere I drove, I saw banners supporting NO on question1...but I also noticed that they were always standing next to a pro-Obama sign.
Curious, is it not? So I started doing some research and I have concluded that every ad is a lie. Blatant lie. They even made a website with more lies. It has become rather apparent that everyone should vote YES on question 1 in order to send a message that enough is enough.
My video is below, but here are important links that will enable you to do your own research.
List of organizations voting NO
MA financial report, check out page 320 for the TRUE budget
Towns at a glance! Shows the REAL state aid for each town.
We are now bombarded by anti-question1 ads and I noticed that everywhere I drove, I saw banners supporting NO on question1...but I also noticed that they were always standing next to a pro-Obama sign.
Curious, is it not? So I started doing some research and I have concluded that every ad is a lie. Blatant lie. They even made a website with more lies. It has become rather apparent that everyone should vote YES on question 1 in order to send a message that enough is enough.
My video is below, but here are important links that will enable you to do your own research.
List of organizations voting NO
MA financial report, check out page 320 for the TRUE budget
Towns at a glance! Shows the REAL state aid for each town.
what about question 2???
ReplyDeleteHowdy,
ReplyDeleteSaw your comment on Badlands, I am the guy who wrote the article. The question you asked the PUMA's about lying to pollsters was gonna be my next question to them. I am all about Blog cross participation, that is why we started the Badlands. If you are interested in working out something regarding the above mentioned topic contact me at criticalthinker133@yahoo.com and/or cbadlands@yahoo.com. Also, you can link to my original site which is www.politicsandcriticalthinking.blogspot.com and leave a comment. That is if you are not comfortable with sending an email. I think it would be a fascinating topic. If you decide to do it we need to move quickly, I would to like to have it out a few days before the election.
Thanks for your time.
CT
You know, you should read the contents of the following link.
ReplyDeletehttp://colony14.net/id41.html
It is a very long read, however, it is very interesting, and comprehensive.
Who knows, you may want to make a video about it.
My choice is to Q#1 - yes. Of course it wouldn't be a majority in MA, but probably our voice'd be heared?!
ReplyDeleteFor Q#2 - no. I do not want any narcotics to be legal, easy for the unfortunate children to obtain. A special prescription to the one particular person who is in the special medical needs to it has to be a legal rule.
For Q#3 - yes. It's amazingly strange that such the animals lovers as Americans are, would vote 'no' on Q#3 upon their own hidden interests and reasons, diguising them in the concerns of growing unemployment possibility as a result of 'yes' votes and forgetting how furious they are with the notion of turturing animals for the case dogs racing competition show.
It reminds me of a false feminism of
Mrs. Clinton in time of her husband's quite frivolous behaviour.
Just yesterday my son scolded me for signing my commentaries as 'anonimous' to this blog.
It's not good and I know it. But in a community I live being not a left wing liberal democrat is quite unpleasant thing even dangerous one. I've heard once on TV Margaret Thatcher saying that she's overheard the passersby's conversation while she was coming out of a car at 10 Downing Street. One of them was saying looking at her:'How do I bored with this old cow.' That's why I've signed my first commentary to this blog as an 'old cow' and I'll continue it this way from now on.
The left wing liberals are, probably, a majority of the Party of Democrats now, they have all companies of massmedia as Radio, TV, News Papers, and Metro in Boston (free!!!) presenting liberals and being quite militant organizations. Only one Fox on TV and a few Radios are presenting the Republicans. Why it happened I do not know. Many of the quite well educated even intelligent people, looking normal to me before we touched the third rail-politics. At that point they become angry, even furious, eager to have the USA converted into socialism with the wealth's redistribution exactly the kind of former utopian USSR was that I unfortunately know too well. Thanks for reading, thanks for this blog.
hey "old cow" - do not give up on question 1, in 2002 it did much better than the polls suggested.
ReplyDeleteI am just surprised that I have to be the first one, with 1 week remaining to get the actual facts out.
Regarding question 2, it is not legalization, but rather a reduction in criminal penalty. I support it, because our war on drugs is not effective and too costly.
Obviously I and many other MA residents share your sentiment of being surrounded by liberalism. Everyone from co-workers, neighbors to extended family.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQsLDrQq1rk
ReplyDeleteTake a look at the survey below. As of 10/31 over 4100 individuals votes and YES is clearly the majority. We all need to get out and vote YES on Question 1 on Tuesday!!! With everyones help we can overcome the "Unions" and get this into law. Don't let the Unions who are hiding behind other names convince to otherwise. Stop the wast and vote YES!!!
ReplyDeletehttp://boston.about.com/b/2008/10/01/massachusetts-question-1-yes-or-no.htm
Snow Hockey will be one sport which is played throughout the world in diverse regions. It includes the bone tissue crushing checks with all the gracefulness regarding sliding throughout the ice. www.scorespro.com
ReplyDelete