Which party supports auditing of the Fed?

After yesterday's passing of the Paul/Grayson amendment and the fledgling optimism beginning to dissapate, some questions have arisen as to which party supports the auditing of the Fed.  The amendment passed in a bi-partisan fashion, however the list of those voting NO is quite telling.  I have prepared the list with party denomination for your viewing pleasure.

The list of those voting NO on the Paul/Grayon amendment:

(D) CA-35 Rep. Maxine Waters
(R) CA-42 Rep. Gary G. Miller
(D) CA-43 Rep. Joe Baca
(D) CT-04 Rep. Jim Himes
(D) FL-22 Rep. Ron Klein
(D) IL-04 Rep. Luis V. Gutierrez
(D) IL-08 Rep. Melissa L. Bean
(D) IL-14 Rep. Bill Foster
(D) IN-02 Rep. Joe Donnelly
(D) IN-07 Rep. Andre Carson
(D) KS-03 Rep. Dennis Moore
(D) MA-04 Rep. Barney Frank
(D) MA-08 Rep. Michael E. Capuano
(D) MA-09 Rep. Stephen F. Lynch
(D) MN-05 Rep. Keith Ellison
(D) MO-05 Rep. Emanuel Cleaver
(D) NC-12 Rep. Melvin L. Watt
(D) NC-13 Rep. Brad Miller
(D) NY-05 Rep. Gary L. Ackerman
(D) NY-06 Rep. Gregory W. Meeks
(D) NY-14 Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney
(D) OH-06 Rep. Charles Wilson
(D) OH-15 Rep. Mary Jo Kilroy
(D) TX-09 Rep. Al Green
(D) WI-04 Rep. Gwen Moore
(R) WV-02 Rep. Shelley Moore Capito

That is odd.  Of the 23 people objecting to a Fed audit, 21 are Democrats while only 2 are Republicans.  Why is this odd?  Because Democrats are often the ones leading the charge against corporations and enterprises large enough to compromise the American taxpayer.  At the same time, Republicans are usually corporatist thugs more occupied with preserving their special interests, yet in this particular instance the divide is painfully obvious. 

While both parties are painfully misguided as to the dangers the Federal Reserve presents this country and the incessant flow of cheap money, some brave individuals (Grayon, Paul & those that voted YES) do get it or at the very least are uncomfortable with secrecy the Fed maintains. 

To all those reading this, seriously ask yourself about the integrity of the politicians and the Party you support and whether we need to seriously and fudamentally change course in this country.

Exit question:  Alan Grayson has been an outspoken critic of Republicans and their position on health care while advocating ObamaCare.  Does he not realize that by supporting legislation that could compromise the Fed's ability to monetize further debt?  Without the printing press Congress will have to suddenly make-as-they-spend thus contradicting ObamaCare and other entitlement programs?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The 2009 credit boom is coming to an end.

Image
The credit expansion boom of 2009 will eventually go down as yet another period of credit expansion promoted by the Fed that will have lead to another predictable bust.   Today, it will be interesting to examine how the various levels of production are behaving under years and years of artificial interest rate suppression.  It will also be helpful to look at charts and graphs examining the business cycle theory and the impact of time preference as taught by Mises. For starters, those new to the concept - a very brief paraphrasing of the general idea. Under a healthy functioning market people's consumer patterns impact their savings.  More consumption equals less saving and less consumption more saving.  In order to progress the society must save such that it can make investments in machinery, equipment, technology, etc if it hopes to increase the capacity of production.   Sure ,you can harvest 10 coconuts a day, consume them by night and repeat the process.  You can also defe
Read more

What is wrong with this country?

I was browsing the latest IBD poll and it finally struck me. I had this idea brewing for the past few weeks now and this particular poll hit a nerve. What jumped out was the age group and who they are likely voting for. Obama / McCain 18-24: 74% 21% The rest of the age groups are more or less even with ages 65+ leaning more for McCain. Those folks should probably avoid leaning - hazardous to their health. Now, if you are a member of this group and are part of the 74% you are probably feeling good about yourself. If you are in the 21% then you are probably used to feeling desperate and angry that your peers ostracize you as if you were the next coming of the bubonic plague. But this number is very telling. Showing to us that a large group of freshly minted liberals, on average still in college, is in a very good position to influence these elections. Enthralled by the concept of "what they want the world to be" and their utopian ideals they hammer their message to anyone willi
Read more

401k Takeover Proposal. IRAs in danger?

Just read a piece that made my blood boil. The story is from Carolina Journal, but I will paste the first paragraph below. Even if you currently do not have a 401k, this is the most dangerous proposal I have ever heard. The only similar example I can think of, would be the gold seizure under FDR. If this proposal becomes legitimate, you MUST write to your local representative, congressman, senator, etc. This will be absolutely crippling to our economy as investors will stage a mass exodus out of the market. If you want a demonstration of this in action, look at Argentina. They just did something very similar. I will keep my eyes on the story and will add further information to demonstrate just how dangerous this is. November 04, 2008 RALEIGH — Democrats in the U.S. House have been conducting hearings on proposals to confiscate workers’ personal retirement accounts — including 401(k)s and IRAs — and convert them to accounts managed by the Social Security Administration. Triggered by the
Read more