Delaware primary race matters to you! O'Donnell gains on Castle.

Things are getting mighty interesting in the race to fill Joe Biden's seat.  Conservative Christine O'Donnell is now capable of defeating Mike Castle in tomorrow' primary and according to PPP is actually in the lead!  This particular race has generated a lot of heated debate and arguments over the correct strategy going into November.

In a nutshell, here is the situation.  Mike Castle is as probably as liberal as it gets and has the votes plus the ratings to confirm this accusation (cap and trade, stimulus, pork).  He is so liberal that calling him a RINO would probably boost his image among rank-and-file Republicans.  Christine O'Donnell, despite being a raging social conservative is strutting her fiscal conservatism and has gotten the endorsements of Jim DeMint and Sarah Palin. Here is the rub, in the latest Rasmussen poll it would appear that Castle has a very formidable lead against the Democrat Coons while O'Donnel is significantly behind.  Presumably then, voting for O'Donnell in this primary is tantamount to "throwing away" the Delaware Senate seat in a state so blue that even Obama can do no wrong!

So, what to do, what to do?

First, there is never a time in American politics where winning is not important.  While Obama's administration and the liberal Congress poses a danger to us, it poses no more danger than any other collection of political goons in the past several decades.  Among those threatened by an ever growing central authority there is always an urgency and always a desire to stop the politicians from spending.   Therefore the argument that Castle is instrumental in slowing down the Senate majority is a generic argument used every single time.  Brown/Coakley is a perfect example, but last time it was ObamaCare and now it is the desperate lame-duck session liable to pass legislation for the sake of it.

Second, we should recognize that races, especially high profile Senate races are an opportunity to spread the message.  A significant drawback of not having Libertarians in Congress is the lack of message that gets out to Americans.   If we assume that each race is an opportunity for a political platform then should we not want the most financially conservative individual running in that race in hopes of illustrating the fallacy of liberal thought?  Exposing and illuminating the dangers of central spending, social engineering and other demonstrable failures committed by our government?  Ignorance is rife and any opportunity to reach out to the populace should be embraced.

Third, winning for the sake of winning is a mantra that only benefits the establishment.  While Dick Armey, Newt Gingrich and other political hacks can pat themselves on the back for seizing another seat in Congress the rest of the country loses.  This is not mere speculation or mental gymnastics, it is simple historical fact.  Over the past three decades we have seen power shift from Democrats to Republicans (Reagan) back to Democrats (Clinton) back to Republicans (Clinton) back to Republicans (Bush) and now back again.  In aggregate, our deficit is larger, our government is bigger, our taxes are biggest (in total), our liberties are impinged and our country is more vulnerable than ever.  So who really wins?  Not you or me.

To summarize.  Winning this seat is not any more important than winning any other seat and winning for the sake of winning accomplishes nothing.  Political races can be used as a means to spread the message, do we really want Mike Castle, one of the most liberal Republicans in Congress to be spreading that message?

Yes, it is possible that O'Donnell loses to Coons in November.  So what?  What exactly do 'we the people' lose?  For some establishment liberal jackass to possibly vote with the Republicans once in a while?  Hardly a loss, especially considering that we give up an opportunity to open some eyes, some ears and some minds that central planning is not working.  Central planning is indeed not working, we need to stop supporting politicians that believe to the contrary and that includes Mike Castle.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The 2009 credit boom is coming to an end.

Image
The credit expansion boom of 2009 will eventually go down as yet another period of credit expansion promoted by the Fed that will have lead to another predictable bust.   Today, it will be interesting to examine how the various levels of production are behaving under years and years of artificial interest rate suppression.  It will also be helpful to look at charts and graphs examining the business cycle theory and the impact of time preference as taught by Mises. For starters, those new to the concept - a very brief paraphrasing of the general idea. Under a healthy functioning market people's consumer patterns impact their savings.  More consumption equals less saving and less consumption more saving.  In order to progress the society must save such that it can make investments in machinery, equipment, technology, etc if it hopes to increase the capacity of production.   Sure ,you can harvest 10 coconuts a day, consume them by night and repeat the process.  You can also defe
Read more

What is wrong with this country?

I was browsing the latest IBD poll and it finally struck me. I had this idea brewing for the past few weeks now and this particular poll hit a nerve. What jumped out was the age group and who they are likely voting for. Obama / McCain 18-24: 74% 21% The rest of the age groups are more or less even with ages 65+ leaning more for McCain. Those folks should probably avoid leaning - hazardous to their health. Now, if you are a member of this group and are part of the 74% you are probably feeling good about yourself. If you are in the 21% then you are probably used to feeling desperate and angry that your peers ostracize you as if you were the next coming of the bubonic plague. But this number is very telling. Showing to us that a large group of freshly minted liberals, on average still in college, is in a very good position to influence these elections. Enthralled by the concept of "what they want the world to be" and their utopian ideals they hammer their message to anyone willi
Read more

401k Takeover Proposal. IRAs in danger?

Just read a piece that made my blood boil. The story is from Carolina Journal, but I will paste the first paragraph below. Even if you currently do not have a 401k, this is the most dangerous proposal I have ever heard. The only similar example I can think of, would be the gold seizure under FDR. If this proposal becomes legitimate, you MUST write to your local representative, congressman, senator, etc. This will be absolutely crippling to our economy as investors will stage a mass exodus out of the market. If you want a demonstration of this in action, look at Argentina. They just did something very similar. I will keep my eyes on the story and will add further information to demonstrate just how dangerous this is. November 04, 2008 RALEIGH — Democrats in the U.S. House have been conducting hearings on proposals to confiscate workers’ personal retirement accounts — including 401(k)s and IRAs — and convert them to accounts managed by the Social Security Administration. Triggered by the
Read more