Debt ceiling debate, public radio, numbers and more.

On the way to work today and on the way back National Public Propaganda Radio was running pieces on the national debt and the debt ceiling.  Not surprisingly the several guests they brought were of the same opinion, any failure to raise the ceiling immediately would result in a catastrophe.  Their explanation was quite simple and partially correct and as usual the devil is in the details and NPR has masterfully ignored them.

NPR and the guests they have procured have recited a popular rhetoric.  A default will cause the interests rates to skyrocket and the value of the dollar to plummet causing long term economic damage.  That is correct, provided of course that the US Treasury chooses to not pay the interest on outstanding debt or pay out maturing debt.  Failure to not pay for schools, agricultural subsidies, homeland security, military bases, lavish transportation costs for Congress and even social security/medicare will not in any way impact our credit standing.  The only way that America can ruin the credit rating is to forego on its external responsibilities.

What are those responsibilities?

Quite simply, as of 2010 the payments for the outstanding interest stood at: 210 Billion dollars.

As a matter of perspective, this this is how much the US Treasury collected in taxes: 1.09 Trillion dollars.  (This does not include social security, ad-valorem and other revenues amounting to an additional Trillion).

Therefore, the only way to really default is to willingly take the two trillion dollars in revenue and purposely and maliciously *not* pay the interest, or a mere 10% of total revenues.

Everything else you are hearing is pure demagoguery, propaganda and misleading information designed to instill fear and terror.

Now the more sticky and unpleasant question is raised, that is, if the ceiling is not adjusted then the US Government is going to stop paying out certain obligations.  So which ones?

Social Security:  As of now this is a non-issue.  In 2010, 864 Billion was collected and 790 Billion paid out.  Therefore the biggest promise of all is still somehow revenue positive and under no circumstances should/could deprive senior citizens their own money.  The fact that the social security fund is actually broke is an entirely different issue.

Defense:  In 2010, 960 Billion was spent.  Think about that for a moment.  A staggering number.  Of that number only 140 Billion was spent on Veterans and can be considered an unbreakable promise.  The remainder is a luxury in the form of equipment, bases, material, salaries, etc.

Health Care:  In 2010, 880 Billion was spent.  Of that, 490 Billion spent on Medicare, the remainder is welfare.  Medicare is a promise that must be kept.

That leaves four promises that the US Government, pending serious reform must pay out in 2011.
Social Security: 790
Medicare: 490
Veterans: 140
Interest: 210
------------
Total: 1.6 Trillion (2010 numbers)


Revenue looking at only two sources comes out to:
Income Taxes: 1.09 Trillion
Social Security: 864 Billion
--------------------------
Total:  1.95 Trillion

That leaves 300 Billion to pend on critical defense, keeping Congress operating and unemployment/welfare and paying out maturing treasuries.

Everything else "defaults".  Is this a solution?  No.  Is this sustainable?  No.  Are people going to get angry?  Of course!   We are paying over 1 Trillion in taxes and under this "default" there will be virtually no services what so ever.  However this will underscore the need for social security/health reforms and will illustrate to the public that our spending structure is unrealistic.  Not raising the debt ceiling will actually force Congress to finally do their jobs instead of kicking the can down the road.

Our investors will get their payments and will be absolutely content.  To them it does not matter whether or not the Departments of Education and Energy suddenly shut their doors. In fact, if anything, it will instill more confidence in our credit system because the revenue ability of the country remains unchanged while spending dramatically plummets!

Any ideas or notions of ignoring interest payments are silly and downright stupid.  Anyone who thinks we can just selectively default on certain bonds is smoking crack.  For example an idea was floated to ignore all bonds purchased by the Federal Reserve - not going to happen.  Even if they purchased these bonds with printed money a domestic default will cause massive damage to the fragile banking system.

Nope, we have to suck it up and pay the piper.  We just need to do it honestly and without the propaganda.  We need to have a mature and serious conversation about austerity which is inevitable and the role of the Federal Government in our lives.  So far, there is no indication that this country, president, Congress or media is prepared to have this kind of conversation.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The 2009 credit boom is coming to an end.

Image
The credit expansion boom of 2009 will eventually go down as yet another period of credit expansion promoted by the Fed that will have lead to another predictable bust.   Today, it will be interesting to examine how the various levels of production are behaving under years and years of artificial interest rate suppression.  It will also be helpful to look at charts and graphs examining the business cycle theory and the impact of time preference as taught by Mises. For starters, those new to the concept - a very brief paraphrasing of the general idea. Under a healthy functioning market people's consumer patterns impact their savings.  More consumption equals less saving and less consumption more saving.  In order to progress the society must save such that it can make investments in machinery, equipment, technology, etc if it hopes to increase the capacity of production.   Sure ,you can harvest 10 coconuts a day, consume them by night and repeat the process.  You can also defe
Read more

What is wrong with this country?

I was browsing the latest IBD poll and it finally struck me. I had this idea brewing for the past few weeks now and this particular poll hit a nerve. What jumped out was the age group and who they are likely voting for. Obama / McCain 18-24: 74% 21% The rest of the age groups are more or less even with ages 65+ leaning more for McCain. Those folks should probably avoid leaning - hazardous to their health. Now, if you are a member of this group and are part of the 74% you are probably feeling good about yourself. If you are in the 21% then you are probably used to feeling desperate and angry that your peers ostracize you as if you were the next coming of the bubonic plague. But this number is very telling. Showing to us that a large group of freshly minted liberals, on average still in college, is in a very good position to influence these elections. Enthralled by the concept of "what they want the world to be" and their utopian ideals they hammer their message to anyone willi
Read more

401k Takeover Proposal. IRAs in danger?

Just read a piece that made my blood boil. The story is from Carolina Journal, but I will paste the first paragraph below. Even if you currently do not have a 401k, this is the most dangerous proposal I have ever heard. The only similar example I can think of, would be the gold seizure under FDR. If this proposal becomes legitimate, you MUST write to your local representative, congressman, senator, etc. This will be absolutely crippling to our economy as investors will stage a mass exodus out of the market. If you want a demonstration of this in action, look at Argentina. They just did something very similar. I will keep my eyes on the story and will add further information to demonstrate just how dangerous this is. November 04, 2008 RALEIGH — Democrats in the U.S. House have been conducting hearings on proposals to confiscate workers’ personal retirement accounts — including 401(k)s and IRAs — and convert them to accounts managed by the Social Security Administration. Triggered by the
Read more