Is Barack Obama a Marxist?

This seems to be the most popular question these days and with Joe Biden banning TV stations from asking tough questions - Americans are interested in the latest hype.

Some distinctly remember how the word 'liberal' sank Dukakis, democrats also remember! Right now they call themselves progressives, because it sounds better.
Make no mistake, progressive and liberal is the exact same thing. They might not advocate outright corporate ownership as that would imply communism more than anything, but they do want to spread your wealth around and grow our already bloated government. How Obama can deny that he is proposing wealth distribution when HE himself said to the now famous Joe the Plumber that we should "spread the wealth around". How stupid does the think we are?

Still, there are more sinister ties to Mr. Obama. His New Party endorsement that he asked for is a direct relationship to Marxists and communists. His relationship to William Ayers is interesting in more than just the terrorism aspect, but Ayers is a self-proclaimed small 'c' communist! He attended a church where black liberation theology was preached. Do you know what BLT is? No, it is not a tasty sandwich.

It is a perverted idealogy that is founded on Marxism. They teach and preach class warfare through the prism of race. Look it up - be disturbed. Even if I give Obama the biggest benefit of the doubt and BELIEVE that he never heard Wright's preaching of hate, then he definitely heard BLT.

Obama is endorsed by the Communist USA party and has brought out more support, donations and participation than any other candidate in history of the party.

Obama proposes more and more government expansion and a more progressive tax system.

Obama is the closest thing to a Marxist that we ever had running for president of the United States. His victory would represent a disturbing, alarming and upsetting move in the WRONG direction.

A video of mine I made a month ago on the subject:

Comments

  1. AnonymousOctober 28, 2008 at 3:27 PM

    I have a burning question no one seems to be talking about. Obama obviously does not like the Constitution. If elected, how would he take the oath of office to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States?” Except by lying. Under oath.

    ReplyDelete
  2. UnknownOctober 28, 2008 at 3:34 PM

    That is a very good question indeed, he openly criticized our Constitution and wishes to make drastic changes via legislation.

    The only thing he will defend in office are his Marxist roots.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The 2009 credit boom is coming to an end.

Image
The credit expansion boom of 2009 will eventually go down as yet another period of credit expansion promoted by the Fed that will have lead to another predictable bust.   Today, it will be interesting to examine how the various levels of production are behaving under years and years of artificial interest rate suppression.  It will also be helpful to look at charts and graphs examining the business cycle theory and the impact of time preference as taught by Mises. For starters, those new to the concept - a very brief paraphrasing of the general idea. Under a healthy functioning market people's consumer patterns impact their savings.  More consumption equals less saving and less consumption more saving.  In order to progress the society must save such that it can make investments in machinery, equipment, technology, etc if it hopes to increase the capacity of production.   Sure ,you can harvest 10 coconuts a day, consume them by night and repeat the process.  You can also defe
Read more

What is wrong with this country?

I was browsing the latest IBD poll and it finally struck me. I had this idea brewing for the past few weeks now and this particular poll hit a nerve. What jumped out was the age group and who they are likely voting for. Obama / McCain 18-24: 74% 21% The rest of the age groups are more or less even with ages 65+ leaning more for McCain. Those folks should probably avoid leaning - hazardous to their health. Now, if you are a member of this group and are part of the 74% you are probably feeling good about yourself. If you are in the 21% then you are probably used to feeling desperate and angry that your peers ostracize you as if you were the next coming of the bubonic plague. But this number is very telling. Showing to us that a large group of freshly minted liberals, on average still in college, is in a very good position to influence these elections. Enthralled by the concept of "what they want the world to be" and their utopian ideals they hammer their message to anyone willi
Read more

401k Takeover Proposal. IRAs in danger?

Just read a piece that made my blood boil. The story is from Carolina Journal, but I will paste the first paragraph below. Even if you currently do not have a 401k, this is the most dangerous proposal I have ever heard. The only similar example I can think of, would be the gold seizure under FDR. If this proposal becomes legitimate, you MUST write to your local representative, congressman, senator, etc. This will be absolutely crippling to our economy as investors will stage a mass exodus out of the market. If you want a demonstration of this in action, look at Argentina. They just did something very similar. I will keep my eyes on the story and will add further information to demonstrate just how dangerous this is. November 04, 2008 RALEIGH — Democrats in the U.S. House have been conducting hearings on proposals to confiscate workers’ personal retirement accounts — including 401(k)s and IRAs — and convert them to accounts managed by the Social Security Administration. Triggered by the
Read more