Obama's first UN speech has anti-Israeli overtones.

Iran's Mahmoud Wackajob and Libya's QadafiDuck enjoyed the speech and probably for good reason given the rhetoric by the Great One. Obama flatly denounced settlements:

"We continue to emphasize that America does not accept the legitimacy of
continued Israel settlements"

Maybe the correct position, but not one to announce to the entire world especially not to a body who has exhibited anti-Semitism and anti-Israeli stances before. Why would Obama purposely demonstrate America's disapproval with Israel other than to appease to the Muslim world? Last week Brezinski announced that American planes based in Iraq shout confront Israeli warplanes in the event of a strike on Iran and today Obama slammed Israel's domestic policy. Nanny in charge wishes to impose his vision and ideals in places where they do not belong and just like he wishes to dictate how we heat our house, what we eat, what cars to drive, similarly he will tell Israel how to conduct their business.

Jews in America voted for Obama overwhelmingly with over 75% casting their ballot for the liberal candidate. This is despite Obama's links with KNOWN anti-Semites like Rashid Khalidi and Jeremiah Wright. Even during the campaign Obama waffled on the matter of Jerusalem, but Jews voted for him anyway. Either liberalism in America trumps all other rationale, loyalty and intelligence or Jews in America want Israel to fail. I refuse to believe that my fellow Jews can be so blatantly idiotic as to believe that voting for Obama was in the best interest of Israel.
For those liberal Jews that still believe we need to have our own country and the existence of our people depends on Israel's existence then you are reaping what you sow. If you are critical of Israeli policy and are exhibiting your discontent by voting for Obama than you are more dangerous than Hamas.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The 2009 credit boom is coming to an end.

Image
The credit expansion boom of 2009 will eventually go down as yet another period of credit expansion promoted by the Fed that will have lead to another predictable bust.   Today, it will be interesting to examine how the various levels of production are behaving under years and years of artificial interest rate suppression.  It will also be helpful to look at charts and graphs examining the business cycle theory and the impact of time preference as taught by Mises. For starters, those new to the concept - a very brief paraphrasing of the general idea. Under a healthy functioning market people's consumer patterns impact their savings.  More consumption equals less saving and less consumption more saving.  In order to progress the society must save such that it can make investments in machinery, equipment, technology, etc if it hopes to increase the capacity of production.   Sure ,you can harvest 10 coconuts a day, consume them by night and repeat the process.  You can also defe
Read more

What is wrong with this country?

I was browsing the latest IBD poll and it finally struck me. I had this idea brewing for the past few weeks now and this particular poll hit a nerve. What jumped out was the age group and who they are likely voting for. Obama / McCain 18-24: 74% 21% The rest of the age groups are more or less even with ages 65+ leaning more for McCain. Those folks should probably avoid leaning - hazardous to their health. Now, if you are a member of this group and are part of the 74% you are probably feeling good about yourself. If you are in the 21% then you are probably used to feeling desperate and angry that your peers ostracize you as if you were the next coming of the bubonic plague. But this number is very telling. Showing to us that a large group of freshly minted liberals, on average still in college, is in a very good position to influence these elections. Enthralled by the concept of "what they want the world to be" and their utopian ideals they hammer their message to anyone willi
Read more

401k Takeover Proposal. IRAs in danger?

Just read a piece that made my blood boil. The story is from Carolina Journal, but I will paste the first paragraph below. Even if you currently do not have a 401k, this is the most dangerous proposal I have ever heard. The only similar example I can think of, would be the gold seizure under FDR. If this proposal becomes legitimate, you MUST write to your local representative, congressman, senator, etc. This will be absolutely crippling to our economy as investors will stage a mass exodus out of the market. If you want a demonstration of this in action, look at Argentina. They just did something very similar. I will keep my eyes on the story and will add further information to demonstrate just how dangerous this is. November 04, 2008 RALEIGH — Democrats in the U.S. House have been conducting hearings on proposals to confiscate workers’ personal retirement accounts — including 401(k)s and IRAs — and convert them to accounts managed by the Social Security Administration. Triggered by the
Read more