Posts

Showing posts with the label berg v. obama

Phil Berg on Michael Savage

Michael Savage mp3 I am still skeptical about this whole case, but apparently the judge is expected to rule soon. My skepticism is rooted in the fact that many cases have of similar nature have been struck down on the grounds that people do not have standing. Berg technically should have no standing to file this suit and I am afraid that this is how the ruling will come down. BUT, if by some miracle, if there is any sanity left in this country and Judge Surrick rules in favor of Berg, then we got a story. At this point it is reasonable to assume that Obama is hiding something. I assume he is hiding something because fighitng a lawsuit for 2 months instead of showing a document seems silly. Oh yeah, Berg also tried to sue George Bush alledging a 9/11 conspiracy. I feel silly clinging to this "right-wing conspiracy" loony toon, but it has a lot of potential - as opposed to that idiotic african press international garbage.

Berg v. Obama

I think I just figured out why a lot of conservative talk show hosts/media outlets are not taking this story. I am kind of dissapointed to be honest, I was really hoping for something here. After all, Berg makes a very convincing argument that Obama does not appear to be a US citizen. Still to be fair, it turn out that Berg is a potential nutjob himself. I guess he hopped on the 9/11 truth seeking band wagon and believes that Bush/Cheney are responsible for the twin towers collapsing. LIBTARD ALERT! LIBTARD ALERT!! If you have been following this case and/or like me putting all your hope in this case, well, unfortunately here is a little character analysis for ya: Berg is crazy?

Michelle Obama tapes being released under Berg counsel

I wish this stupid story would just die, I still do not believe it is real. Right now my mind is racing in many directions coming up with explanations of recent events. So here are the facts in chronological order. 1) African Press International claims that Michelle Obama called them and said some defiant things 2) Most people called BS 3) API defended their position 4) API claimed they have tapes of her voice 5) API promised to release tapes and did not 6) Most people called BS (again) 7) API contacted Phil Berg who is suing Obama ( Berg v. Obama ) 8) Phil Berg whom I believe is a good man, accepted to defend API This is just a touch much. API by all accounts appear to be a sham organization, the story looks weak, the domain of the website looks odd and they have more spelling mistakes than one could count. Why is Berg now involved? Can this possibly be a ploy to discredit Berg and get rid of the case? Given that he is really the last person who can stop the Obama machine - this ...